All-in Summit: Interview With Elon Musk (youtube.com) 74
All-in summit -- a conference hosted by Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks and David Friedberg, who also operate a popular weekly podcast by the same name -- interviewed Elon Musk on Monday. In the wide-ranging interview, Musk talked about Twitter's bot problem, governments, immigration, and among other things, gave more insight into the scale and ambitions of Tesla and SpaceX.
Re: (Score:3)
While I have respect for Musk, for Tesla (getting EV onto the market) and SpaceX (Private funded space travel) where there was a lot of adversity and people saying it cannot be done.
However, is isn't a magic man who knows all things, and his opinion on everything isn't always correct. As well living for a while as a billionaire, distances himself from the issues of the every day folk. A lot of his musings are akin to "If they can't eat bread, then let them eat cake!".
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
is that if you wanna be a success you've got to work 100 hours a week.
That's because he doesn't mean success defined as having your own business with minions to boss around. That's his success, which you can't have unless you recreate all the circumstances which lead to his wealth (the majority of which involved being at the right place at the right time). I'm just going to assume what he's really implying is that if you earn 60 hours of overtime pay, you might finally be able to afford one of his cars.
Never mind there's probably no employer on Earth who would actually pay
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
which involved being at the right place at the right time
Sour grapes. I'm sure there's plenty of code jockeys on Slashdot that could have created zip2, PayPal, Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc....but you didn't.
So, get over it, and stop being so whiny and jealous about people that were more successful than you.
So many are in love with WFH...I guess that means they're always in the right time and place now.
Ford, Chevrolet, Chrysler, etc. were in the "right time and place" where they could have prevented Tesla from gaining a toehold...but they didn't, so now they ha
Re: (Score:1)
Sour grapes. I'm sure there's plenty of code jockeys on Slashdot that could have created zip2, PayPal, Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc....but you didn't.
Just because you were the first to come up with something novel does not necessarily mean you'll be able to capitalize on it. Just ask any bartender who was serving vodka sodas well before White Claw ever became a thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Just because you were the first to come up with something novel does not necessarily mean you'll be able to capitalize on it
And that ability is the difference between an inventor and an entrepreneur. Luck and privilege play some part, but most people with an interesting idea never manage to capitalize on it simply because they do not try.
Re: (Score:2)
You can't just "have an idea", you must be willing and able to push it forward, market, trademark, patent, replicate, etc. If you want to sell a great idea to investors, you must have the communications skills to do so.
Re:My favorite quote from Mr M (Score:4, Insightful)
The fact that one man has (checks Google) $44 billion dollars to blow on Twitter because he doesn't like the way it is run, is a clear indicator that something is clearly wrong. Normally, you'd either invest back into your businesses and/or pay your employees better wages, or anything really would be more useful than buying a company so completely unrelated to your previously established fields of industry.
It'd be like if you held stock in Apple and all the sudden the CEO had this fascination with buying up some butt lube company. Then he gets on social media and constantly talks about butt lube, and how all of the other butt lube companies are doing butt lube completely wrong, and how he plans to revolutionize the butt lube industry with this acquisition. I'd be like "Yeah, I bought stock in this company for their phones, tablets and that sort of thing. I didn't invest in butt lube. I'm out."
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Seeking an under-performing company, as an investment, is kinda the "thing" you're supposed to do.
Buys it/improves it/makes money/invests in something else....repeat cycle.
Then, all the "nobody should have that much" types can gripe about how the, now much larger, positive economic impact he has, is still not good enough...It will never be good enough. You gripe about how his $44billion should have "gone to solving world hunger", but don't bat an eye at sending $40 billion in weapons to Ukraine (which real
He doesn't have that money (Score:2)
It's hard to say what will happen but it's increasingly likely the whole thing will fall through. I'm hoping it does because Mr M has already said he'll bring back the former guy and if he does that they'll be Mass incitement for violence sim
Re: (Score:2)
Those 14s are in completely different hand writing, that doesn't mean shit.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:My favorite quote from Mr M (Score:5, Interesting)
The fact that one man has (checks Google) $44 billion dollars to blow on Twitter because he doesn't like the way it is run, is a clear indicator that something is clearly wrong. Normally, you'd either invest back into your businesses and/or pay your employees better wages, or anything really would be more useful than buying a company so completely unrelated to your previously established fields of industry.
It's funny how we can speak of "normal" when talking about the CEO who has endured more shorts against his companies than probably any other CEO in the history of US Capitalism. When you speak of "normal" investing, keep in mind that hedge funds make about as much sense as Too Big To Fail. Greed has kindly responded to your request for compassion, with fuck off.
Normally we watch CEOs blow their billions on personal islands and obscene car collections. I guess you would prefer to watch Elon do that arrogant shit as the "normal" demonstration of wealth, to make you feel better?
Re: (Score:2)
I guess you would prefer to watch Elon do that arrogant shit as the "normal" demonstration of wealth, to make you feel better?
Just think what that same money could've done if it went towards BEV charging infrastructure and Tesla R&D. There's a far bigger potential upside to that, versus taking the reins of a social media company that could just as easily end up being the next MySpace.
Re: (Score:2)
Just think what that same money could've done if it went towards BEV charging infrastructure and Tesla R&D. There's a far bigger potential upside to that, versus taking the reins of a social media company that could just as easily end up being the next MySpace.
It's a shame that you are not in charge of how he spends his money.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess you would prefer to watch Elon do that arrogant shit as the "normal" demonstration of wealth, to make you feel better?
Just think what that same money could've done if it went towards BEV charging infrastructure and Tesla R&D. There's a far bigger potential upside to that, versus taking the reins of a social media company that could just as easily end up being the next MySpace.
The man dumped $100 million of his own personal money into Tesla and SpaceX, and created two of the most advanced companies in the world. When I think of the potential upside of that, I think about saving the human race via the US Space program he's certainly kept alive. Bit more long term than some bot-filled weapon of Mass Distraction. Might surprise a few to learn he may have never intended to actually buy Twitter, but instead dismantle it from the inside by exposing it for the bullshit machine it is.
He got bailed out by the government (Score:2)
So we subsidized his company by allowing GM and Ford to make cheaper dirtier cars that put out more smog. That saved GM and Ford a ton of money because dirty cars are much more profitable. The money in question basically came from you and me in the form of breathing dirtier air and all the health problems we
Re: (Score:2)
About these government programs his companies would have gone out of business and he'd be broke and we wouldn't be talking about him. Once again he's a welfare Queen.
That's a bit like saying "without modern steel technology the skyscraper would have fallen over and a lot of people would have died and we wouldn't be celebrating the architect. Once again, the architect owes it all to Big Steel!"
That may be true, but it's naive to assume the architect would have even attempted to build the same skyscraper in the hypothetical where the thing has to be built without steel beams. Given that Musk does seem to have some business sense (bizarre decision to acquire Twitter not
Re: (Score:2)
But you chose to instead be alarmed by someone who simply wants to make it easier for people to express themselves, including you.
No, I think it's alarming that Musk perceives whatever is going on with something as ephemeral as a social media company to be a bigger issue than, for example, the fact that there's 8 gas stations within my DJI Spark drone's range of my home, and I've still never even seen a Tesla Supercharger. I know they certainly exist and I'm sure I could find one if I checked Google Maps, but I've yet to drive past one. $44 billion could buy a lot of charging stations.
As to free speech, if you're beholden to someone
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is not freedom of speech, or lack thereof. The problem is people who think they have the right to say anything that pops into their heads and not be held responsible for the consequences.
Parading in front of the Capitol chanting "Hang Mike Pence!" and putting up a gallows has nothing to do with freedom of expression, and everything to do with communicating threats.
Claiming that Trump won the 2020 election when he clearly didn't has nothing to do with freedom of expression and everything to do wi
Re: (Score:2)
And how would you treat those who protest in front of people's houses? Is that freedom of expression, or "communicating threats" (intimidation) as you said?
The trick here is that if you give freedom of expression, some will definitely use it to tell lies! (and other bad stuff) That's the cost (and possible knock-on effects). You virtually never have a freedom without some cost. It's whether you believe that the freedom is worth the cost.
You can have freedom of expression, but you have to deal with tho
Re: (Score:3)
The thing about people showing up and protesting in front of somebody's house is that they can be photographed and identified, can be arrested if breaking any trespassing or public nuisance laws and that they actually showed up
In the twittersphere, currently anybody can create false accounts, and use them to spew lies and misinformation without any negative consequences
One of Elon's ideas to support free speech in twitter is to eliminate any anonymous accounts and require that people use their verified real
You know he's not going to do that right? (Score:2)
He's hoping to be a modern day Randolph Hearst, using media to drag us all into wars for his amusement and profit.
Re: (Score:2)
Facts are that twitter is currently infested with bot, it would be idiotic at this point to NOT employ them
Like the old Vulcan Saying (Only President Nixon could go to China), only a past master of bot propaganda could go clean up Twitter
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that one man has (checks Google) $44 billion dollars to blow on Twitter because he doesn't like the way it is run, is a clear indicator that something is clearly wrong.
Musk doesn't have $44B to blow on Twitter. He has to sell part of his stake in Tesla to finance it.
Normally, you'd either invest back into your businesses and/or pay your employees better wages, or anything really would be more useful than buying a company so completely unrelated to your previously established fields of industry.
This comment doesn't make any sense. How would Musk sell Tesla stock and invest back in the business? Sell Tesla stock on the open market, then have Tesla issue new stock he could buy with the resulting cash (assuming the board was okay with issuing the stock)? If Tesla needed the cash, and the board authorized it, they should just issue new stock and put it on the market.
And as for Elon personally paying T
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You need to work harder, smarter, know the right people, be at the right place at the right time, follow the right rules, break the bad rules...
The more successful you are the more tolerant the culture is towards any failures, thus they are easier to recover from.
I have seen people who worked harder then me, become stagnant in their job, because they were not smart enough to do their job better every time, and transistion themselves to new jobs.
I have seen people who are smarter then me, get canned, because
2016 Elon = Anakin, 2020 Elon = Darth Vader (Score:5, Insightful)
Elon Musk is transforming from Anakin Skywalker to Darth Vader. He’s forgotten how carbon credits, which were a gift from the left, got Tesla out of its darkest days. He won't recall that nowadays or even express any kind of appreciation. The traditional car makers didn't throw a big hissy fit like he threw when they recently got credits for using union labor. As did bailout money (which he paid back, but doesn’t change the fact he was given the money at the time he thought he needed it.) .. I get banned pretty quickly. Meanwhile he leaves whacko Sandy Hook denial comments on there saying he doesn't want to censor free speech, That's how Republicans operate. They want their own free speech, God forbid you try to counterpoint any of their misinformation. They claim counterpoints to their lies as "censorship" and remove those.They opposed net neutrality, but wanted twitter declared an essential service and taken over. Meanwhile healthcare, food, and housing are not essential to those fuckers. He can't control his anger towards the extreme left and the result is total abandonment of centrist/humanist/left values and strong pandering to the right-wing. The measure is the fact that they all heap tons of praise on him. I don't know if he needs Yoda to train him on anger management or what. Either way, I wouldn't be surprised if Elon shows up at a Trump rally in 2024.
He makes provably false claims that 10% of the right wing is mad at him. That's total BS, he's doubled down on going after the left. Nowadays he is so far gone to the right that he even seemingly pandered to climate change skeptics. He went from proclaiming himself a socialist as recently as 2016 to being a full-on right-wing extremist in 2022. Heck as recently as last year he even said he doesn’t want Trump back. But now he is in full right-wing appeasement mode. He claims he is center but if so, why isn’t he saying or doing things that anger the right wing? He is also displaying signs of paranoia common with right-wing nuts. I mean The Onion made one joke about him and he permanent-cancelled them. If this were truly about free speech, that would be cool. But realistically we know that right-wingers are the kings of censorship. I mean whenever I post comments on right winger websites like Alex Jones
And yes it is clear that he considers normal left eh same as extreme left. I mean, I can delineate the two with this chart:
Extreme left: You get canceled for using the wrong pronoun without malicious intent.
Left: Unintentional misgendering is OK. Acknowledge that gender is a spectrum. Which it is, btw, gender is controlled by hundreds of genes and variants of transcription factors such as SRY which may or may not always be on the Y-chromosome.
Extreme left: Tax unrealized gains of ownership in companies.
Left: Tax income. Tax high income at a large percent.
Extreme left: Make all health care public. Nationalize hospitals and medical research.
Left: Ensure everyone can get healthcare, by paying for private or public insurance. Subsidize insurance payments for the poor, allow private enterprise and competition in all aspects of health care (insurance, hospitals, and pharmaceuticals).
Extreme left: Immediately get rid of ALL fossil fuels and halt anything that has the word nuclear.
Left: Phase out fossil fuels, regulated nuclear power plants and nuclear fusion research is OK.
Extreme left: Cancel someone for unintentional bias.
Left: Educate people to eliminate their biases, but be tolerant of misgendering that is not deliberately intended to insult.
Extreme left: Do not use robots for anything, hire only union labor.
Left: Use robots, and improve worker conditions. Government should implement UBI based on taxation of corporate profits and robot usage.
Extreme Left: Allow physiologically male athletes to compete in women's category if they state that they identify as a woman.
Left: Allow reasonable tests to ensure that gender-specific hormones have always b
Re: (Score:2)
When you have to provide an hour of land mine instruction to define any political party, it's probably best to stay away from the whole damn field of destruction. You have tried and failed to delineate here. Elon may be many things, but he isn't a moron. Most can't even interpret what he mocks in a coherent manner, so it's not surprising to find yet another example. You'll probably be one of many who is shocked or appalled upon finding out that Elon never intended to actually buy Twitter too.
And Govern
Seems quite backwards (Score:2)
TLDR
You can be totally against carbon credits or other government subsidies which only ever end up retarding growth of an industry, while also being smart enough to take free money the government is handing out.
The inflation we are going through now is the child of endless subsidies we've had for a while. At some point you do more harm than good by continuing to hand out money, and any other car company COULD have done what Musk did when he did it - remember they chose not to.
Re: (Score:2)
There were some subsidies during the height of the pandemic but they sure weren't "endless". And they didn't cause the present inflation 2 years later.
Re: (Score:1)
And they didn't cause the present inflation 2 years later.
Showing you do not understand the momentary system at all. Good luck buddy you're gonna need it!
Re: (Score:2)
No, what caused the present inflation was the "We will print an extra $2.2T, which will surely fix our inflation problems".
Face it, inflation is what happens when you increase the money supply without increasing the supply of things you can buy with money.
And no, adding $2.2T to the money supply does NOT cause more things to be made quicker....
Re: (Score:2)
It was either that or a serious economic collapse.
https://news.northeastern.edu/... [northeastern.edu]
“So the combination of the government support and supply chain bottlenecks has resulted in inflation,” says Triest, a former vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. “That’s not necessarily indicative of a government mistake, because the economy actually performed quite well. We didn’t have an economic collapse.
“It’s a judgment call whether there was too muc
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Musk has recently praised Chinese workers for "burning the 3AM oil" and lamented that Americans are too lazy to do that: https://www.theguardian.com/te... [theguardian.com]
The guy is just another billionaire asshat who is too convinced of his own genius. I wish someone would list all the predictions and promises he made over the years that didn't come true, or ask him about that crappy deathtrap tunnel he built.
Twitter is toxic for people like him. He has an endless stream of useful idiots kissing his arse on there, talking
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What do you mean they are hardly the reason .. they provided hundreds of millions of revenue, when Tesla was almost bankrupt and "eating and sleeping at the office" .. if they didn't have that money coming in the company would be toast -- that's a fact. They wouldn't have been able to pay creditors and suppliers, they would have been done. Reference: https://insideevs.com/news/438... [insideevs.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
According to Elon himself they BARELY made it through certain years. .. including 2017 .. when they had to bring back a CFO from retirement to help them make it. Which means literally every dollar mattered. You are saying that they would have been OK without a hundreds of millions dollars of cash infusions due to carbon credits every quarter? Between 2010 and 2019 they got $2 billion dollars in payments from regulatory credits. And that's not even counting the $7500 tax credit customers used to get per vehi
Re: (Score:1)
I'm also not a Republican, more of an old school progressive or libertarian.
The barriers I'm talking about are all of the crony capitalism that helps big interests and locks out small ones.
These credits are just a small part of the economic landscape. Given all of the other mess, these credits made a difference, but Ds are hardly saviors.
These credits were not made for Tesla; Tesla was helped by gene
Re: (Score:2)
"Extreme left: Tax unrealized gains of ownership in companies."
I remember when the extreme left wanted to nationalize all large companies without compensation.
He says declining populations are biggest problem. (Score:4, Insightful)
Then proceeds to talk about how fantastic the present is. We are headed from a world where clean water, land to live on, fresh air were free, to a world where you stand anywhere you must pay to be there. The clean water will be privatized, and you must pay for things you despise, like cars, because society demands them. All this makes everyone obese and sick while they spend their lives making other people things they dont want but have to. If they make enough, they may gain the privilege to walk in the woods their ancestors lived in. It sucks. The greatest problem civilization is facing is the fact that everyone in it wouldnt wish it on their worst enemies, and so dont want to have children.
Re: (Score:2)
you must pay for things you despise, like cars, because society demands them.
Cars are just the technological evolution of riding on top of a smelly animal to get somewhere faster (which in its day, caused its own set of problems [historic-uk.com]). It's actually quite nice to be able to get into a little climate controlled box, listen to your preferred music, and transport yourself somewhere and back, on your own schedule.
The problem is that it's a luxury made affordable only by externalizing the true costs. Once you fully internalize the costs of private vehicle ownership, you end up with a price
Re: He says declining populations are biggest prob (Score:2)
I used to live in the city on the west coast, using only bike and bus for years. I was way fitter. Out in more rural areas I live now, and in many states, you simply a need a car now, and we built things that way.
Re: (Score:2)
It is the technological evolution of riding on top of a smelly animal, but it might (I think) also be a evolution of lack of empathy. I mean, to domesticate a wild animal for your own use .. that might have required we see our own needs as more important than the animal's. I mean, our ancestors used to hunt animals and eat them, so why would they care about capturing and enslaving one? Note domestication of the horse was probably not the same as domestication of the dog or cat. The dog or cat probably hung
Re: (Score:3)
He says declining populations are biggest problem. Then proceeds to talk about how fantastic the present is. We are headed from a world where clean water, land to live on, fresh air were free, to a world where you stand anywhere you must pay to be there. The clean water will be privatized, and you must pay for things you despise, like cars, because society demands them. All this makes everyone obese and sick while they spend their lives making other people things they dont want but have to. If they make enough, they may gain the privilege to walk in the woods their ancestors lived in.
You can buy a thousand acres in Canada for pocket change and walk through the woods for an entire day without seeing another living person. So what's stopping you? You're not doing it because you don't want to. And same goes for everybody else, including Canadians.
The number of people bitching about land, water, and air while sitting on a comfy chair in a climate-controlled room with a fucking nonfat, no whip, no foam, three pump peppermint, one pump skinny mocha quad venti bullshit coffee at their elbow
Re: (Score:2)
The number of people bitching about land, water, and air while sitting on a comfy chair in a climate-controlled room with a fucking nonfat, no whip, no foam, three pump peppermint, one pump skinny mocha quad venti bullshit coffee at their elbow without even a hint of irony is mindboggling.
Nobody would put so much energy into making up two lines describing this kind of coffee - I bet you either consume or serve this kind of "beverage" :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody would put so much energy into making up two lines describing this kind of coffee - I bet you either consume or serve this kind of "beverage" :-)
Neither. I looked it up samples on Quora. :) And adapted one by deleting some elements. People go further than that, routinely.
Re: (Score:2)
You can buy a thousand acres in Canada for pocket change and walk through the woods for an entire day without seeing another living person. So what's stopping you? You're not doing it because you don't want to. And same goes for everybody else, including Canadians.
Why should anyone want to do this? And how much have you yourself purchased? Oh, really? Why not?
Re: (Score:2)
Why should anyone want to do this?
I dunno. Because they want to build their mailbombs in peace?
And how much have you yourself purchased? Oh, really? Why not?
Irrelevant. I'm not the OP. I already have land with trees, with clean water, and with tolerably clean air. I'm not the one bitching.
Re: (Score:2)
People would like to do that stuff, but they also need to eat and pay the bills. The reason that property is so cheap is because it's difficult to live there unless you can already afford a really good quality of life somewhere else anyway.
Re: (Score:1)
a world where clean water, land to live on, fresh air were free
Sorry, the world has never been like this. Land to live and fresh water have been paid for over and over again in wars, for generations. I hasn't changed a bit. Civilization means we don't kill eachother that often, but the competition is still there. As for fresh air, you can have it, there is plenty. The price you pay is not being where the rest of humans live. As has always been.
Re: He says declining populations are biggest prob (Score:2)
That is not true. In fact when this country was founded, much of the land was settled by homesteading, free land if you developed it. Now, land is decoupled from the idea that actually using it gives you rights, so even cheap land is gobbled up by investors who raise the price while it sits empty.
The larger point is I am not some weirdo. Loads of people are saying they dont want to bring children into this world, so population is declining, suicide rates are up, etc. My gripe may be fringe, but for all thes
Re: (Score:2)
The greatest problem civilization is facing is the fact that everyone in it wouldnt wish it on their worst enemies, and so dont want to have children.
Nonetheless, I much appreciate being alive today rather than in the middle ages. If it weren't for modern medicine saving my life years ago, I would have suffered horribly and died slowly.
We are headed from a world where clean water, land to live on, fresh air were free
And we killed each other over said water, land, and air, just like the current situation in Ukraine. At this point in history, I'd have expected war to be obsolete... but some people prefer to live in the past.
All this makes everyone obese and sick while they spend their lives making other people things they dont want but have to.
Well, that's because they are stupid, self-entitled, and spoiled. In my case, I was reasonable. I worked hard
Character is comprehensive (Score:1, Funny)
Need more Musk? (Score:4, Informative)
If you need more Elon Musk, "The Everyday Astronaut" just posted a 30-minute walk-and-talk with him around the Texas campus on YouTube. In that they talk about scrapping the cold gas thruster system, the new ullage thruster system, plans for S24, the tricky business of unloading Starlink satellites out a small door ("Like a PEZ dispenser"), catching starship with mechazilla, the layout of the heatshield, future optimizations to the front fins, why they still have grid fins on booster, and a lot more.
If you're not a fan of Mr. Musk, there's content for you too. He gets distracted while talking and almost gets run over by a boom truck
I haven't felt that plugged in to a rocket company since Armadillo Aerospace (RIP). I'm not an EvAs Patreon, but I'm going to find a way to slide him a couple of bucks for this. It was that awesome.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]