The US Plans To Block Sales of Older Chipmaking Tech To China (protocol.com) 40
The Biden administration will attempt to roll back China's chipmaking abilities by blocking tools that make a widely used type of transistor other chipmakers have employed for years. From a report: The Biden administration has for several months been working to tighten its grip on U.S. exports of technology that China needs to make advanced chips, with the goals of both hurting China's current manufacturing ability and also blocking its future access to next-generation capabilities. According to two people familiar with the administrations plans, President Joe Biden's approach is based around choking off access to the tools, software and support mechanisms necessary to manufacture a specific type of technology that is one of the fundamental building blocks of modern microchips: the transistor.
To achieve its objectives, the administration has elected to work to block China's access to transistors that use a specific design called FinFET. The plans include blocking domestic exports of tools that are capable of printing chips with FinFET transistors, while also preventing the tool makers -- such as Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA -- from servicing or supporting equipment they have already sold to various Chinese companies, according to the sources. Big chip manufacturers achieved high-volume production of the transistor technology targeted by the Biden administration roughly eight years ago, but it is still widely used today to manufacture advanced chips designed for servers and iPhones alike. China's largest chipmaker, SMIC, disclosed in 2019 it recently began high-volume production of FinFET-based chips.
To achieve its objectives, the administration has elected to work to block China's access to transistors that use a specific design called FinFET. The plans include blocking domestic exports of tools that are capable of printing chips with FinFET transistors, while also preventing the tool makers -- such as Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA -- from servicing or supporting equipment they have already sold to various Chinese companies, according to the sources. Big chip manufacturers achieved high-volume production of the transistor technology targeted by the Biden administration roughly eight years ago, but it is still widely used today to manufacture advanced chips designed for servers and iPhones alike. China's largest chipmaker, SMIC, disclosed in 2019 it recently began high-volume production of FinFET-based chips.
Horse has bolted (Score:5, Insightful)
Better close the stable door...
Re: (Score:2)
That door has been open for over a decade. I read an article the other day that stated US Corporations are OK'ing 90% of all tech sharing requestst from China and other non-allies or rivals of America.
Re: (Score:2)
Generally speaking USA stuff is made in China, hilarious calling trade partner of hundreds of billions of dollars "non-allies" or "rivals". So now their military is starting to be threat? Where did they get the money to do that eh?
Re: (Score:1)
A war with China would go nuclear, navies and armies don't matter then. the USA is far more fragile to getting top ten major cities and their suburbs wiped out than its enemies.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
China actually has a no-first use nuclear doctrine unlike the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Although some people may say it's just words, it's at least better than the US who "reserves the right of first use".
Re: (Score:1)
China has threatened nuclear war against Japan and USA many times. Yeah, China's "no first use" is just words on paper, mean less than nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, so long as China isn't producing their own older chipmaking tech, then this will have an minor impact. Basically, it will be a speed bump in which they will need need to move from purchasing to produce their own chipmaking tech.
Just makes it more expensive (Score:4, Insightful)
So the USA are simply creating more incentives for China to step up their tech R&D game.
"Develop" (Score:4, Informative)
If the USA blocks the tech & they can't make the chips, what will they most likely do? Develop the tech themselves
If by "develop", you mean outright steal and copy the plans from somewhere, then yes indeed they will develop the tech...
Same results, just much faster.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My conclusion, China's tech is bad because the original which they copy is also bad.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
China will simply buy some of the tech from Europe, where all the best and highest end chip manufacturing gear is from.
The rest they are developing through heavy investment in R&D, and through luring expertise away from Taiwan with big salaries.
All the time you concentrate on stopping them "copying" stuff, you are just falling further behind as they put the work in to develop it themselves.
Re: "Develop" (Score:2)
How do you think we managed to get to the moon in such a short time?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If the USA blocks the tech & they can't make the chips, what will they most likely do? Develop the tech themselves
If by "develop", you mean outright steal and copy the plans from somewhere, then yes indeed they will develop the tech...
Same results, just much faster.
And the copies are terrible.
The Soviets did the same thing. Copied western tech but were never able to make it quite as good. They kept using the Rolls Royce Nene design for decades after RR developed better engines like the Avon because we'd pretty much sold the plans to them for the Nene in the 50s (Britain was proper broke back then). They tried to copy better engines and failed. Same with the ICs in the 70's. If it were that easy, China wouldn't be dependent on imports for all it's high tech equipmen
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Biden, or better said his advisors because of the guy's dementia, are getting very aggressive and hell bent on putting the wrench into Chinese fab expansion. Even worse than Trump, in fact.
But the writing has been on the wall since 2018 (Fujian Jinhua), so Chinese have been working and testing, in parallel, domestic substitutes just in case foreign exports and support are cut off for political reasons.
As long as ASML is shipping DUVL equipment, it won't make much mid-term difference (since Chinese machines
Re: (Score:2)
So at the moment, China imports the tech to make these chips because it's cheaper than developing the tech themselves.
The part that you are missing is the software and support. In the short-term they will be getting stuff from the blackmarket and their software from piracy. This provides an opportunity to sabotage their systems via software, making it possible to ruin the hardware that they have just like they did with Stuxnet.
So the USA are simply creating more incentives for China to step up their tech R&D game.
Absolutely. Doing so creates the opportunity for say, the NSA to disrupt their progress in a similar manner that Stuxnet slowed Iran from refining uranium.
Do you not remember Stuxnet?! :D
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Stuxnet was an act of cyber-terrorism by one nation state (Israel) against another (Iran)
LOL @ "cyber-terrorism". If you think preventing a nation from being capable for building a nuclear weapon is "cyber-terrorism" then sure.
Anyway, it was both the US and Israel working together. It's not a secret.
You think the USA would do something like that against China? Do you know how closely interdependent the USA & Chinese economies are... And you know they've had nuclear weapons since 1967, right?
Absolutely, yes, yes but not the exact year.
China hacks the US, the US hacks China, both deny it and we move on without any nuclear war. You clearly don't realize just how normal these kind of attacks are.
Re: (Score:2)
BTW, the USA were implicated in the attack be
Re: (Score:2)
This would most likely have resulted in radioactive contamination & maybe injured or killed staff.
LOL! Your lack of knowledge on the subject is amazing.
BTW, the USA were implicated in the attack because they provided the malware to Israel & probably intelligence too but it was Israel alone that carried out the attack
Provided the malware? The NSA worked out how to wear out and even knock over the centrifuges. Having them fall over was intentional and considered a great success. We didn't just hand it over either, we built most of Stuxnet including the 0-day attacks while Israel modded and deployed it. This was a joint venture and claiming anything different is stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How was slowing down Iran's nuclear ambitions a bad thing? Seriously, "Death to America" isn't just a chant of extremists, it's a slogan promoted by their leaders. Do you not recall that they back Hezbollah which would not hesitate to detonate a nuke? I don't see how enabling Iran to have nuclear weapons could possibly do anything but harm. Israel and the USA absolutely did a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
tl;dr - The Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear enrichment programme did nothing to halt Iran's nuclear weapons programme because Iran hasn't had a nuclear weapons programme since 2003.
Iran has also ratified international treaties against nuclear weapons (the non-proliferation treaty), chemical weapons, & biologica
Re: (Score:2)
tl;dr - The Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear enrichment programme did nothing to halt Iran's nuclear weapons programme because Iran hasn't had a nuclear weapons programme since 2003.
That is a report from 2007. Furthermore, the International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to conclude that their nuclear ambitions were entirely peaceful. But wait there's more.
As of 2021, Iran has reached a 60% enrichment level. In May 2021, the head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, stated that "only countries making bombs are reaching this level".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you think Stuxnet was an act of war then you should know that the whole world is at war right now. Since you have nothing to add to the conversation, I bid you a good day.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't Taiwan is technically part of China? (Score:2)
Why buy when you can clone? (Score:2, Insightful)
What I mean is that in each profession, China has about the same spread of professions as the US or Europe. So if the US as 350 million people and there are X percent of semiconductor technology engineers, then China will have approximately 4 times as many.
It took the rest of the world decades to learn to make these technologies because they lacked a foundation to copy from. When a new process node requires a gamble of $10 bi
Re: (Score:2)
The fancy ones are using (ASIC) Application-Specific Integrated Circuits, Gravity Pipe for astrophysics, MDGRAPE-3 for protein structure computation and such.
Re: (Score:2)
1.4 billion people who on average are per-capita similar to Americans or Europeans.
What I mean is that in each profession, China has about the same spread of professions as the US or Europe. So if the US as 350 million people and there are X percent of semiconductor technology engineers, then China will have approximately 4 times as many.
This is complete hogwash, though. You've asserted some nonsense. Noice.
Good idea (Score:2)