Jiang Li, Ph.D., is the Founder and CEO of Vivalink, Inc.
getty
With the advancement of consumer-grade technology, there's been a significant increase in the use of personal devices for various healthcare purposes. From smartphones and tablets to fitness trackers and smartwatches, patients are increasingly using their own devices to track health metrics, access medical information and communicate with healthcare providers.
The Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) trend involves individuals utilizing their personal devices for both work and medical purposes, in turn integrating personal technology into healthcare workflows. While BYOD adoption offers numerous benefits, it also brings risks, especially concerning data security, privacy, reliability and accuracy.
As patients increasingly rely on personal devices in healthcare settings, professionals need to acknowledge the risks they bring and support the use of medical-grade devices. It's important to ensure that medical-grade devices meet standards for data security, accuracy and regulatory compliance. Doing so is vital for delivering effective healthcare and protecting patient information.
Consumer-Grade And Medical-Grade Wearables In Healthcare
In recent years, the popularity of consumer-grade fitness trackers, smartwatches and heart rate monitors has soared, offering users the ability to monitor health metrics and track their fitness goals. Smartwatches make up a major segment of the growing global wearables market. According to the Pew Research Center, nearly one in five U.S. adults (21%) say they regularly wear a smartwatch or fitness tracker. Looking ahead, the smartwatch trend is only set to increase in popularity. Statista projects global smartwatch shipments to surge from 37 million units in 2016 to over 402 million units by 2027.
While these devices provide valuable insights into a patient’s daily activity levels and overall well-being, it's important to acknowledge the distinction between consumer-grade and medical-grade wearables. Medical-grade wearables, specifically designed for medical use, undergo rigorous testing and certification processes to ensure accuracy, reliability and regulatory compliance. They also are often used under the supervision of medical professionals.
Medical-grade wearable devices play an increasingly vital role in modern healthcare. They monitor multiple vital signs and parameters, including heart rate, skin temperature, heart rate variability and respiratory rate. Devices that offer continuous monitoring also enhance the accuracy and reliability of data by collecting patient data over a period of time and under varying conditions.
By recognizing the risks associated with relying solely on personal devices and emphasizing the importance of certified medical devices, healthcare providers can safeguard patient data integrity, maintain regulatory compliance and ensure high-quality care. Educating patients on the benefits of medical-grade wearables and the potential drawbacks of using their own devices can further enhance the effectiveness and safety of RPM.
Assessing Risks And Considerations Of BYOD
In a recent study, researchers delved into the challenges hospitals face with BYOD policies. They uncovered concerns surrounding insufficient device security, staff awareness and usage guidelines. According to the findings, hospitals need to educate staff, establish clear policies and employ suitable technological solutions to effectively handle implementation challenges and adapt to evolving risks associated with BYOD.
With wearable technology and personal devices on the rise in the healthcare industry, it's important for both healthcare professionals and patients to prioritize the adoption of medical-grade wearables for medical purposes. Using personal fitness trackers or smartwatches for medical purposes presents distinct challenges.
Accuracy and reliability: Medical-grade wearables undergo thorough testing and certification processes to ensure accuracy and reliability in clinical settings. In contrast, personal fitness trackers may not meet the standards required for medical use, leading to potential inaccuracies in health data monitoring. For example, a temperature sensor on a smartwatch may not produce an accurate reading due to its location on the body and exposure to ambient temperatures.
Data security: Personal fitness trackers may lack adequate security features designed to protect sensitive medical data. As a result, there's a higher risk of data breaches or unauthorized access when using these devices for medical purposes, potentially compromising patient privacy. Many consumer-grade trackers automatically send data to the vendor’s cloud, which may or may not be HIPAA compliant.
Regulatory compliance: Medical wearables are subject to regulatory requirements that ensure their safety and effectiveness for medical use. For example, in the United States, medical devices undergo review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before being approved for patient use. Devices are classified into risk-based categories, ranging from Class I to Class III. Personal fitness trackers may not meet these regulatory standards, affecting their suitability for clinical applications. For FDA clearance, medical devices must also undergo clinical validation to demonstrate their effectiveness in monitoring specific health conditions and outcomes. However, personal fitness trackers may lack clinical validation data, making it difficult to assess their accuracy and reliability for medical monitoring purposes.
Interoperability and integration: Wearables are often designed to integrate with healthcare systems and electronic health records (EHR) platforms, allowing for efficient data exchange and interoperability. Personal fitness trackers may lack interoperability features, making it challenging to integrate their data into existing healthcare workflows and systems.
While personal fitness trackers offer convenience and accessibility for general health and wellness tracking, they may not be suitable for medical purposes. Providers should exercise caution when considering personal fitness trackers for medical monitoring and prioritize the adoption of medical-grade wearables that meet established standards for safety, effectiveness and data security.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
