Skip to content
RVs, cars, trash and personal belongings  are visible at the homeless encampment along Coyote Creek near Old Oakland Road on May 11, 2023, in San Jose, Calif. The City of San Jose has given until Monday, May 15, for unhoused people to vacate the site. (Dai Sugano/Bay Area News Group)
RVs, cars, trash and personal belongings are visible at the homeless encampment along Coyote Creek near Old Oakland Road on May 11, 2023, in San Jose, Calif. The City of San Jose has given until Monday, May 15, for unhoused people to vacate the site. (Dai Sugano/Bay Area News Group)
Ethan Varian, Bay Area News Group housing reporter
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

San Jose officials are proposing to spend $120 million over the next fiscal year to combat homelessness — about 2% of the city’s expected $5.3 billion budget.

In addition to funding ongoing efforts such as building more tiny home shelters and providing outreach services, the money could help launch entirely new programs — from managed tent encampments to bus tickets to reunite homeless people with loved ones — in hopes of bringing many of the city’s estimated 4,400 unsheltered residents off the streets.

“Homelessness in San Jose is a humanitarian, fiscal, and environmental crisis that requires bold action,” said Mayor Matt Mahan, who’s in charge of steering the budget process, in his annual spending message.

The homelessness plans are outlined in the city’s latest budget proposal, released last week. Officials will continue to refine the budget before the City Council approves it in June. Here are four of the key plans:

Sanctioned tent encampments

At the direction of state environmental regulators, the city is developing an ambitious $27 million plan to move about 1,000 homeless people from its creeks and rivers over roughly the next year. Without enough shelter beds for everyone, officials are exploring setting up sanctioned tent encampments or “safe sleeping sites” for about 500 of those unhoused residents.

Mahan has cited a city-run managed camp in San Diego, which provides individual tents and basic security and sanitation, as a successful model. However, a sanctioned encampment in Sacramento that offers few services is under threat after the local district attorney labeled the site a public health hazard and sued the city to close it.

There’s also legal uncertainty about whether sanctioned encampments constitute the “adequate shelter” cities are expected to offer before clearing unmanaged camps. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has signaled it may overturn that requirement in a decision set for next month.

The city is still determining what the sanctioned camps could look like and where they may go. Setting up the sites could cost between $18,000 and $40,000 per tent, or between $9 million and $20 million in total, according to the budget proposal. The spending plan also highlighted cost concerns and noted the city might only be able to provide minimal services.

“Homeward Bound” 

City officials are proposing setting aside $200,000 for a pilot program that would pay for transportation and relocation expenses to reunite homeless people with friends or family within or outside the city.

San Francisco has a similar program, which has helped thousands of people since starting in 2005. In recent years, however, it’s been mostly sidelined as the city has focused on other homelessness efforts, including building supportive housing.

While homeless advocates sometimes dismiss such programs as “Greyhound therapy,” the budget proposal calls for closely tracking whether people find loved ones and secure a safe place to stay.

But how many would want to take advantage of the program, dubbed “Homeward Bound,” is unclear. Despite the commonly held belief that California cities like San Jose are a magnet for homeless people from across the country, an estimated 85% of unhoused residents in Santa Clara County were already living in the county when they became homeless, according to the most recent official survey.

Expanding “no return zones”

As the city adds more tiny homes, RV safe parking lots and other temporary shelter options, officials also want to establish more “no return zones” in areas where they’ve cleared encampments and moved people indoors.

The city has already employed this strategy along the Guadalupe River downtown. Now, officials are discussing banning camping along more waterways and other areas where encampments have posed serious health and safety hazards.

Additionally, the budget proposal calls for creating no-encampment areas within two blocks of every planned and existing tiny home facility, safe parking lot and managed encampment, in part to convince residents to accept the sites in their neighborhoods.

The proposed budget would allocate almost $1 million next year for city parks employees and police to establish and enforce no return zones around the city.

More tiny home shelters

Erecting tiny homes and cabin shelters has been one of San Jose’s top homelessness priorities in recent years, and next year will likely be no different.

Currently, the city operates six tiny home or cabin shelter sites, totaling more than 500 units, with three new facilities in the pipeline to add hundreds more beds.

Excluding state and federal grants, the city estimates it will spend around $25 million on the sites next year. The proposed budget recommends covering those costs by shifting $8 million from Measure E, a property transfer tax that mostly goes toward affordable housing.

Another $16.6 million in Measure E funds would be spent on clearing waterways, sanctioned encampments and other homelessness efforts, leaving $11 million for housing. But some homeless advocates have argued using most of the money for shelters and other temporary solutions is a shortsighted strategy.