Research Indicates All Linux Vendor Kernels Are Insecure - But There's a Fix!

These findings raise crucial questions about the trade-off between security and stability in the Linux ecosystem, impacting the practices of Linux admins, infosec professionals, and sysadmins worldwide. Let's examine the level of security that Linux vendor kernels offer and the best practices admins can implement to improve kernel security.

Are All Linux Vendor Kernels Insecure?

Recent findings highlight the inherent insecurity of vendor kernels, with known yet unfixed bugs potentially leaving systems open to exploit. With over 800 security bulletins issued against Linux alone in just the past month identifying potential security holes and vulnerabilities, securing kernels has never been more urgent for Linux administrators. Adopting stable branches from kernel.org is encouraged. Such an approach could have long-term ramifications, encouraging organizations to prioritize security over stability in their kernel selection process.

Businesses must carefully consider the complexities involved with upgrading to new kernel releases, weighing both security benefits and risks posed by newer kernels when making decisions about updating. While security enhancement is evident, system administrators could run into stability issues with newer kernels requiring further investigation by system administrators tasked with maintaining system integrity. To maintain a balance between security and stability, it may be necessary to revisit current practices of kernel management to achieve effective outcomes.

Mitigation Strategies for Protecting Against Kernel Bugs

While kernel vulnerabilities are a critical concern for Linux admins, there are measures you can take to help secure the Linux kernel against them, including:

• Applying Linux Kernel Security Patches: Regularly applying security patches to the Linux kernel can protect it against known vulnerabilities and ensure it remains up-to-date with the latest security fixes.
• Enabling AppArmor or SELinux: These mandatory access control systems add an extra layer of protection by enforcing fine-grained access controls and restricting processes' actions, decreasing vulnerabilities or malicious activities that could threaten the system.
• Enabling Secure Boot in "Full" or "Thorough" mode: Secure Boot ensures that only approved, digitally signed software runs during boot-up, protecting against untrustworthy or malicious code loading.
• Utilizing Linux Kernel Lockdown: Linux Kernel Lockdown is a security feature that restricts certain kernel functions to prevent unauthorized changes and reduce the attack surface, thus protecting against specific threats.
• Implementing kernel module signing and loading rules: Authorizing signed kernel modules and enforcing rules regarding their loading helps prevent the introduction of untrustworthy or malicious modules into the kernel, improving system security.
• Hardening the Sysctl.conf File: Configuring and hardening sysctl.conf provides fine-grained control over various kernel parameters, helping secure the system by limiting potential attack vectors while improving resource use, stability, and security.
• Implementing Strict Permissions: By setting strict permissions on system files, directories, and configurations, only authorized users or processes will have access to or can modify them, decreasing the risk of any unauthorized changes or malicious activities occurring.
• Utilizing AuditD for System Monitoring: AuditD is an efficient system monitoring solution capable of tracking system events, gathering audit logs, and detecting suspicious activities or violations, helping identify and prevent potential security risks.

For more information on these best practices and practical advice for implementing them, explore our Feature article, How To Secure the Linux Kernel.

Our Final Thoughts on These Kernel Security Findings

This research challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding Linux vendor kernels, urging security practitioners to prioritize security by embracing stable kernel branches. The insights provided catalyze reevaluating existing approaches to kernel security and highlight the importance of staying abreast of the latest developments in the Linux ecosystem. By fostering a culture of proactive security measures and continuous improvement, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with insecure vendor kernels and strengthen their defenses against potential threats.

As security professionals and Linux enthusiasts, it is imperative to engage with the study's findings and explore ways to enhance the security posture of Linux systems. By emphasizing the adoption of stable kernel branches and promoting a security-first mindset, admins can navigate the complex landscape of Linux security with confidence and resilience.