Democracy Dies in Darkness

Carolyn Hax: Is it selfish or self-care to cancel plans, ‘etiquette be damned’?

A reader wonders whether it’s wrong to put ourselves first, instead of hosts, when we want to skip events we agreed to attend.

Advice by
Columnist
May 20, 2024 at 12:00 a.m. EDT
(Illustration by Nick Galifianakis for The Washington Post)
3 min

Carolyn Hax is away. The following first appeared April 25, 2010, and has been lightly edited.

Dear Carolyn: You wrote previously, about declining invitations one has already accepted, that “the host has feelings that need to be treated with more care, in this case, than one’s own.” A co-worker of mine would answer this with, “Well, I want to do what I feel like, etiquette be damned.”

Doesn’t a person have a choice to do what they desire most? This person would say: “You only live once. I don’t have to do anything I don’t want to do.” Is this wrong?

— Anonymous

Anonymous: Seriously?

I guess your charming colleague hasn’t seized the day at work yet and shoved extra chores onto you because life is too short to spend chained to a desk.

Skip to end of carousel
(For The Washington Post)
I’ve written an advice column at The Post since 1997. If you want advice, you can send me your questions here (believe it or not, every submission gets read). If you don’t want to miss a column, you can sign up for my daily newsletter. I also do a live chat with readers every Friday: You can submit a question in advance or join me live. Follow me on Facebook and Instagram.
End of carousel

Granted, knowing when to put yourself first and when to put others first is more art than science. But it still involves a basic calculation: Am I ready to accept the consequences — to others and to me — of putting myself first?

For example: You want to blow off a friend’s party because you’re tired. Acting on that might be fine — if it’s a big party, say, or if you’ve been great to that friend for years and have earned a little forgiveness, or if that friend is particularly laid-back and gets that not every night is the right one.

But if you punk out on a carefully planned dinner party because you just don’t feeeel like going — because you “don’t have to do anything I don’t want to do” — then your jilted host will wonder why hours were wasted in the kitchen on you and whether your sparkling presence is worth the price of your egocentric scheduling whims.

Honestly, do you sparkle brightly enough to tip that balance your way?

We always have the option of putting ourselves first. But once you start exercising that option every time you want to (don’t feel like it), as opposed to the occasions when you need to (too sick to circulate), then you’re really exercising your option to be boorish, thoughtless and self-centered.

And in that case, you might as well just go for it and start cutting cafeteria lines, smoking in elevators, shoplifting, running red lights and, why not, killing people who stand between you and trophies or promotions or front-row seats … all the things that people with any clue about how civil society works — people who aren’t feral or psychopathic — wouldn’t even consider.

Dear Carolyn: I would like your opinion on guys who check out other women when they are out with their girlfriends/fiancées/wives.

— Curious

Curious: Eyes — male and female — like to fall on pretty things.

When those eyes don’t linger, then the romantic companion needs to reread the above and chill.

When those eyes do linger on someone, then looking becomes staring or, worse, leering — which is rude to the pretty thing and the companion. Anyone can unwittingly drift into a stare, but those who make a habit of it deserve to be called out for it by their mates.

When this calling-out exposes a difference of opinion on what’s appropriate, and this disagreement — or any other disagreement, for that matter — plays out frequently, then both parties need to realize that they’ll never agree, and either embrace it or break up over it (to the hearty applause of everybody who has had to listen to their bickering).